Showing posts with label language. Show all posts
Showing posts with label language. Show all posts

2/24/25

SNL 50TH ANNIVERSARY SKITS DESPERATE - UNFUNNY - GUTTERAL and GROSS

I really wanted to be amused - especially by the UFO abductee skit that featured some so called "A List" actors, but it seems the SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE 50th ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL featured comedic desperation which resorted to dirty shock value !

I always appreciated that SNL was on. It was so New York City and one of the few television shows on networks that featured creative skits and guests - but over 50 years I was not ever a chronic viewer.

In recent years, on a Sunday, I would watch the YouTube redux of the previous night's skits. I and some friends loved the Donald Trump parodies especially.

I enjoyed the fairly recent dog park skit, in which the actors ran the gambit of dog behaviors from scooting butts on the floor to the zooms, but one of my dog-lover friends saw it and said, "No! No!  They didn't!

The skits I saw for the 50th anniversary - sorry!

It's kind like when Joan Rivers was funny for national television standards but she (and her daughter) became known for filthy language outrageousness and crass putdowns instead. 

If you want to laugh without all the sexual references, watch DRYBAR Comedy on YOUTUBE!


9/30/22

BIBLICAL PROPORTIONS and OTHER HYPERBOLE

BIBLICAL PROPORTIONS and OTHER HYPERBOLE

All languages change over time.  New words or spellings of words are added. Sometimes words go out of favor and are eventually considered archaic or are never used again.  If the word or terminology is used for a while, a few decades, it can be show up in the dictionary,  Then there is slang which sticks around for a season or a generation or two, usually a short cut in language.

I had a friend who used the term BOSS. Just about everything she liked was BOSS.

Lately BOSS got turned into THE BOMB...

Technology has introduced new words and definitions for words such as Cookie.

Are you using slang or terminology from another culture or era?

I know I sometimes say something that my mom or dad would have said and I wonder where they got it from.  Sayings that, when it comes right down to it, do not seem to relate to our culture or life experience such as.  "After a while crocodile."  To which one responds. "See you later alligator."  (We did not golf, so this cannot have to do with perhaps wearing the right shirts.)

Film informs us of how people talk or talked, such as all those gangster films (1930's-1940's) which brought organized crime slang into our pop culture language.  I use the term moola for money, which I think of as funny or dismissive of money. (Mafia and criminal slang of more recent times in films overuse the slang term that originated in Germanic language, f*ck.)  I cringe when I hear people calling murder, "Taking Out."

But, re my criticism of a recent Politically Correct film in which historical figures from decades ago were envisioned as heroes of civil rights and used present day slang and terminology such as "Conversation,"  and "People of Color," maybe we should be skeptical of dialogue in Old Hollywood films as well. Maybe gangsters did not all go around calling money, moola, or maybe they too had regional or cult terms. Maybe they were stereotyped in those films.

Why would anyone who knows criminals do damage to individuals and society as a whole want to honor them by using their slang?

Then there are the words used improperly to exaggerate, words that are histronic.

For instance, the term BIBLICAL PROPORTIONS has been used in recent years every time there is a threat of a natural disaster associated with climate change, such as hurricanes. Well, the storms do seem to be getting more and more destructive, impacting thousands. Still, Biblical Proportions always implies the Great Flood in which the Entire Earth was destroyed, covered in water. There has not been a rain storm on earth that Great since, so I do wish newscasters and the reportage media would quit using it inaccurately, as a means to hype people up with fear and make them evacuate.

Think of how subtle but powerful a simple word such as BAD is instead.

You get a phone call about someone who has just gone to the hospital. The caller simply says, "Christine, it's BAD," and I'm on my way to the hospital to see that person as they die.

Another wrong usage of our language seems to have started with young, hyper-positive teenagers and young people, especially girls and young women.  That is the use of SUPER, which is being used as a modifier. SUPERSWEET, SUPERIMPORTANT...

SUPERMODEL is also an exaggeration. SUPERMODEL is applied now to models or actresses and entertainers who said they modeled, which they did a few times perhaps, or did without ever earning a fortune from it. Supermodel has been in our language over 2 decades but should be applied only to those models who appear on numerous magazine covers with the effect of becoming known throughout the world and become rich from modeling. Gigi Hadid for instance is a Supermodel, but what's-her-name Heidi Klum was never and is not. She's pretty, has no embarrassment of showing her breasts, and perhaps has other things that are nice about her personality or talents, but she was never a SUPERMODEL.

SUPER has taken the place of VERY, which is also overused. The words sweet, important, all words, can stand alone in their meaning.

Hyping words up with SUPER actually has a dulling or deadening effect to their meaning. Hyping up attempts to create more importance and drama to the word to the point where we search for or invent a word that implies even more. Overall, we are better off using an exclamation point but, before we do, asking ourselves if really the word or the sentence deserves one.

I know that once one gets the hang of using words like SUPER or f*ck, somehow it's difficult to rid yourself of them.  A good reason why one ought to is that the older you are, the more you sound ignorant or stupid, like you actually don't have much of a vocabulary.

Sometimes I think hyperbole has something to do with the whole Positive Thinking movement, for along with SUPER, SO is also used to exaggerate. In a revved-up, sometimes sing-songy way, the young woman thrills,  "We had SUCH a good time. She was just sooooooo excited.  I am so-ooo going back there!"  

If she's talking about Burning Man, I get it, but if she's talking about a birthday gathering at the local pizza parlor, I take it this person doesn't get out much.

Fantabulous, supercalifragilisticexpealadocious, or giamonstrous?

Hell no... these are creative terms but...

Fantastic, fabulous, giant, monster, are all stand alone words.

Even using them, a more accurate description might be good, big, or lizard.

I ask you to think about this and urge you to use accurate words, expand your vocabulary, cut the slang, just as I'm trying to.

C 2022 Christine Trzyna

4/21/21

FOOT IN MOUTH : EXPERIENCE SEVENTEEN : CHRISTINE TRZYNA WRITING WORKSHOP


 

Think back to a time when you said something wrong, insensitive, or stupid - a time you "put your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH."

What happened? Was it funny then or do you think so now? How did you feel? Did you leave the remark to sting or influence or float in the air and walk away? Was it a remark you aimed or said unthinking?

Did you let it go?

Set the scene. Write it as dialogue.

Go from there.

Christine Trzyna

This exercise is part of a series of writing exercises and to bring up the whole series use the tag Christine Trzyna Writing Workshop. 

C 2018-2025  Christine Trzyna 
All Rights Reserved including Internet and International Rights
OK to use this post in not for profit situations. Please credit me. Send me love.  It's karma.


6/8/20

NETFLIX's POLITICALLY CORRECT SERIES "HOLLYWOOD" A FANTASY

I indulged myself in this series, which is supposed to be set in Hollywood after World War II.  I love historically correct exteriors, interiors, clothing (costuming), hairstyles, and so on, so I stuck with it.  It seemed to be an excuse for displaying suggestions of homosexual sex.

I kept thinking about how Netflix often nears pornography and how offended some of our American population is by this; Netflix doesn't care about loosing or offending some viewers. 

Let me save you the time spent watching it.

It was so politically correct it was ridiculously inaccurate.  It was the result of idealistic but ignorant script writing - a clear agenda - not based in historical accuracy.

Let's start with the language.  The young female Black actress talks about herself as a "person of color."  Black people in the 1940's were not called persons of color (to mean anyone not considered to be "white") nor were they called African-American or Black.  They were called Negroes and called themselves Negroes.  Into the 1960's some of the older people still referred to themselves that way.

Then there is a part of dialogue in which the actor refers to "the conversation" using it in the 2020 way.  Nobody in the 1940's thought conversation was anything other than talking to one or more people.

In the fantasy that this series is, feminism and gay liberation as well as racist issues are all part of the plot.  The characters are considered to be heroes and heroines as they move these ideologies forward.  Actually in real life such aspirations started happening twenty or more years in the future.  For instance, female studio executives and studio heads are a result of the thrust of feminism and women's liberation of the 1970's.  But they got it right when they suggested Hollywood was a Jewish-made town and most all of the first stage of female studio executives were Jewish women.

Multiple characters were based on people who are dead and research apparently included tabloids. These characters include Rock Hudson and agent Henry Willson and as characters they are used to give us more sex.

I note that Scotty Bowers, the man who a couple years back wrote the memoir Full Service, about a gas station in Hollywood that was a front for a prostitution service, is named as a character.  I read Scotty's book and he said he never took money for hooking people up, that he did so for pleasure and friendship, but he's portrayed as a failed actor who took a 50% cut.

I guess this is one of the reasons that I'm so focused on documentaries and memoirs. I'm up for some speculation and if a series is clearly labeled fantasy at least I know what I'm in for.  Know those popular posters that have James Dean riding Marilyn Monroe on the back of his motorcycle?  It never happened.  Hollywood - the Netflix series - is like that.


C 2020 Christine Trzyna