Showing posts with label Right to Privacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Right to Privacy. Show all posts

1/18/24

PRIVACY : EXPERIENCE FORTY-ONE : CHRISTINE TRZYNA WRITING WORKSHOP


 

PRIVACY

What information do you withhold about yourself?

With someone new in your life?

With your relatives?

With your boss or co-workers?

With yourself?

Why? 

Christine Trzyna

This exercise is part of a series of writing exercises and to bring up the whole series use the tag Christine Trzyna Writing Workshop. 

C 2018-2025  Christine Trzyna 
All Rights Reserved including Internet and International Rights
OK to use this post in not for profit situations. Please credit me. Send me love.  It's karma.


3/12/23

HINKY

What makes one person hinky and another not?

I checked the definition of this slang word, which means, as a an adjective, nervous or suspicious.  The problem with this definition is that it's not correct.  A hinky person may not have a case of the nerves or be or act suspicious at all. A hinky person makes YOU nervous or suspicious of them. You think that the person is up to no good. And now that you "know" it, you are somehow involved because they involved you. Involved because they know you know - somehow.

It could be how they look but I think it's more than that. Few people on this earth are beautiful or handsome, which is why we notice those who are and why there is so much emphasis on being one of them.  

I  once saw a gallery of old photos on the internet, in which a number small time criminals from a hundred years ago or so had been photographed for an exhibition. These were not arrest photos or prison photos but simply portraits, each man's true nature explained - a pickpocket here - a con artist there.  The question I had was if their looks - their faces - had made it difficult for them to find honest work, forcing them to go into crime. They appeared to be an inspiration for the no-good characters in a comic strip such as Dick Tracy. Had these photos been taken for some Nazi-like purpose? To prove genetic misfortune predicted psychology? Eugenics? For each person, called hinky, was a slight bit unusual looking or hunkering; no 100,000 dollar big smiles here. What of that big slouchy hat? Did hinky people also dress different?

In today's world in which there is so much sexualization, it can be confusing about what is healthy and what is not.  Hinkyness has something to do with sex but yet is not just about sex. it's perhaps more about feeling a person is somehow predatory.

When it comes right down to it, who is or isn't hinky might be something that is self- determined, something without anything close to universal agreement.  Does a person make you uncomfortable?  To the point where your skin actually crawls?

Having a reaction to another person that causes me to think they are hinky is to have a reaction that is a bit different than that they made me feel uncomfortable. I feel the need to find a way to get away from them or to avoid further encounters with them or to at least be very cautious with them. I have a feeling of regret that I ever spoke to them or was in some situation where I met them. While being uncomfortable can happen simply for lots of reasons that are generally inconsequential.  

Lots of people are a bit eccentric, or artistic, or nonconforming, or "odd" or thought to be by others and are not hinky. Maybe it's because I've experienced city life, but I take a lot of different people in stride without suspicion.

For instance, a small town overly protected woman I met would actually whisper to her husband that she needed protection at the sight of a man walking down the street who was tattooed or pierced or who sported a rock and roll effect, while seeing such a person has no special effect on me. But the small town woman would hold herself back and stare and mumble and take a breath in and say "Look at that. Oh my God!" First of all, the man was simply walking down the street and not having a personal encounter with her.  If he was also bulked up and walking towards me in a threatening way, I would be concerned that I not get cornered by him. Otherwise it's just another person doing their own thing with their appearance. And as for the rock star effect, I'd probably think "But he has no interest in me so what's the point?"  (I would hire such persons qualified for a job - with a couple exceptions.  I cannot stand piercings through the nose that appear to be something forced upon a cow so that it could be lead by the nose.)

People can be called or considered odd just because they have a lifestyle you don't have or you don't understand. It could be as simple as that the person never married. Or that they love dogs more than people. Or, that they eat meat. 

***

I strained to think of women I've know through the years that I could call hinky. 

Men?  I could think of several I met who I determined were hinky.  (I could write a book on a hundred bad dates.)

As an example:

I can't remember where or when I met a particular man that I went out on a date with at this point or how it was that he asked me out. But I do remember that the one and only date was uneventful, nothing glaringly obviously wrong except that he attempted to impress me that he was a Rich Preppy - except that he was Jewish and not a WASP - and at that time even construction workers in their dirty uniforms were throwing sweaters from L.L. Bean over their shoulders in bars.  Maybe we went to lunch on a Sunday in Pasadena...

He referred to going to polo matches and talked his investments. He was arraying his feathers as a peacock, showing off. He didn't seem much interested in me.  I wasn't the self expresser I am now in those days. I was just supposed to sit there and be impressed. Be pretty. However, I started feeling that I wanted to go home already. I also felt myself feeling wary of him physically on the way home, even though I was in the passenger seat with a seat belt on and he was in the driver's seat with his seat belt on. He had not reached across the table to hold my hand.  He had not tried to play footsie with me under the table. I should've felt safe.

As we pulled up to the curb, I already had my hand on the door of the car, ready to get out and go. I said a polite goodbye - with no wish to linger, talk, discuss a future plan to get together, or invite him up for coffee.  No, this educated, clean, employed (we speculate monied) gentleman, though a pathetic snob, had not said or done anything that was obviously hinky,  But then he did it, as I went for the car door, my head turned towards the window, I felt a tounge go for my vulnerable left EAR, which by the way held an earring!  We had never hugged or kissed. We were not having sex. Yes, he was doing that.  He was using the last few seconds of our encounter to taste my ear wax. To really stick it in there. Did he think he was turning me on?  I needed to shower ASAP.

I pushed the car door open, got out, and slammed it. I keyed the security gate and ran up the stairs. My phone was ringing. I answered. It was him asking me if I got into my apartment OK?  Was this just to show off that he had a cell phone and could call from the car? He did not call again.  HINKY.

Example:

One of the men I think of, as hinky and hinkier, I still encounter once in a while due to his current job.  But I also encountered him at the job previous to that one and the job previous to that one. He's young, trying to string jobs together to come up with a career like a lot of people. From this I learned he has a history of "falling in love" with women who are here, there, and everywhere, often much older, and often otherwise unlikely. He seems to me to be stuck in the phase boys usually go through, not lingering, in which a person is infatuated with another from afar. Like junior high school.

I now suspect any such person as likely having a rich fantasy life and being a porn addict and either avoidant of real relationships or unable to conjour any.  (For the record I see nothing wrong with NOT being in a relationship, in not being married, or celibacy, as a life style choice. These conditions are a lot better than being in a bad relationship. Take it from someone who has had a number of women friends in bad relationships with men.)

That's NOT it!

A few years ago when I first encountered him, I believed that he wanted to meet someone likely, I invited him to an event where a woman I'd met was working, telling him that she was nice, smart, pretty, and available. (And they were close in age.)

I clued her in too and she was into it. At the sight of him she flipped her hair. Unlike the gallery of cons previously mentioned, this man is actually very good looking.  You would think that he had women throwing themselves at him but that's not the case. 

I call this a soft meet. I will not match make or specifically introduce anyone for the purposes of a match up and the event meant they were simply in the same room together. He could decide if he found her attractive and go from there, make his own moves. Afterwords he said he did find her attractive but he did nothing about it.  That's OK.

However, I came to think that he had agreed to attend this event for another reason. Because we had planned to take a walk together afterwards to get some exercise.

We took the walk after the event, a couple miles. At that time he did not know where I lived. As we clearly entered the next town, he suddenly said "We passed your house. Where is it?"  So, he was wanting an address.  

"Oh we passed it a while back," I said.  And let that go.

But then came the day someone wanted to put a camera in my face, take a photo, without first asking, which I hate and which happens way too much now. All these people who need content, who want you in their film or on their web site. I don't like it. I told one person NO PHOTOS so she published one in which the back of me and my dog was showing, as if the back of me is not me. NO PHOTOS!  (The beginning of the end to that friendship.)

I had a long day and was feeling tired and I did not want a photo taken, so I spoke up.  And damn if this man told everyone there it was because I thought that a photo would zap my ENERGY, like my anti-photo stance had something to do with an esoteric idea, an ethnic religious thing.  They believed him. What bullshit!

Pain in the ass.

Does everyone look everyone up on the internet?  That was next.  He was trying to find out other information about me that would clue him in so he could be the Mr. Know It All about me. I happen to know there has been and is misinformation related to me or other people with the same name or close to on the Internet. Including someone who was supposed to have been arrested at my address who was not living there and who I never met - an ex tenant who was clearly still using the address months after I moved in. And years ago I actually shut this blog down for some time because some woman who was not me had her picture exposed on Yahoo and under it was a quote that was from me - from my blog.  Good luck to her finding a job!

Does anyone remember when we thought that Russia - the Soviet Union  - Communists - did the kind of spying on their neighbors that people are now thinking of as "transparency" in the U.S. ???  Well, tell me you have Facebook and there is not much of a chance that I'm actually going to look at it. 

The more this man wanted to know about me, the weirder I thought he was and the more uncomfortable I got with him. He didn't just want information for himself, but to give to others, to show off to them or be in with them and to REPORT into them. 

Then one day he asked me if I would like a little free-lance work. I thought this had something to do with the job he had but he revealed no, it was for him personally.  I said what I usually do.  Well, let me see what you've written so far, and I'll let you know if I can do it. I mean if I want to do it. He said he needed editing and a rewrite.  It turned out he had invented a game. Two pages into his writing, which was incredibly screwed up for a college grad, I realized the game was a game in which women were sex trafficked.

I was appalled.

I'd started editing and wrote notes on the first few pages. But when I realized what was what, I wrote an angry feminist diatribe all over the papers.

One day he caught up with me and asked me what I thought.

I said something like As A Woman I Cannot Put My Energy towards a project like this. It took courage for me to say that and it should not have. I let him know I did not approve. I was not going to be involved in a game in which women as objects were to be traded back and forth among Mexican Mafia drug lords as prizes and the object of the game was to own the most women.

He suddenly realized I was not compliant. "Where are my papers he asked" and I knew he was afraid I had shown it to others.  I had not. "Oh, I can't remember where I put them," I said, honesty.  *Maybe I had shredded them? I I'd spared him my critique of outrage.

From that point on, this hinky character has made it a point of involving himself in my life in some way, in particular when it comes to more free lance work; leads that are always a waste of time - jobs that really do not exist - to the point where I will not follow through if the so called lead is from him.  He has presented himself to OTHERS as a person who gets me work but he never has.  He just wants to appear to be so HELPFUL to me to impress them. Being in situations in which I can't entirely avoid him without carefully planning not to, I see him and hope he is too busy to be friendly.  I caught him watching what I was doing on a computer screen more than once, walking behind me to look. I think of him as a spy.  A gossip. As up to no good. 

At the time of the sex trafficking game he invented, which he said was "just a fantasy"  (Yea well, raping babies just starts with a fantasy too...) I spoke with a friend of mine who became a Fundamentalist Republican Christian. Her church prides itself on attracting men from the local drug and booze rehab and I conclude that people who are out of control need the strict rules of a church like that, but... 

She thought I should tell on him.  I was torn up. Who would care or listen?  Was there any reason to think that he himself was at all involved with sex trafficking? Or the Mexican Mafia? There was not. (Was he going to market his game on the Dark Web?) Did I want to create a situation in which he might loose his employment?  I tend to not want to effect anyone's employment, to go that far. What it came right down to was that I did not trust the people I would have told to have my point of view or my back.

I chose not to get into it. I hoped that my reaction to his game had put a stop to it.  

****

Hinky...

The skin crawl.

Some years ago when I was writing with a partner, he had a friend, a man who was a regular at the public library, a man who was supposed to be so rich he never had to work. Had he ever tried to? I had seen him around at one branch or another for a few years and well, I was also a regular at libraries at the time, using the public computers, researching for a writing project, and so on. His apartment, dinners out, car, basics, were all paid for though he did not seem to be living lavishly. On the basis that he did not have to work, rather than that he was a homeless hanger-outer, he attracted a group of men who liked to small talk, tell jokes...bad jokes. I stayed on the outskirts of these men when they were in a group, knowing if I ever wanted to be one of the boys it would not be one of these boys...

Well, came the day when the rich kid proved that he was either mentally ill or the ultimate spoiled brat.  He took off in his SUV to parts unknown. His dad did not know where he was except when, after a month, the bill for his charge card came in and he was able to see that he had already spent about $10,000 and had stayed at exclusive resorts as well as what could be considered skid row adjacent lodgings. He was driving all over the state, not leaving the state, spending like he could. He was on the run. But who from?

I recalled the day when I was out front of the library taking a break and some men with cameras showed up. The men were taking photos of the new architecture but this rich kid hid behind a pole. He was showing signs of paranoia.  

I was enlisted to try and "talk" to him and I had tried. The story went that he had witnessed an auto accident that was probably a set up.  A friend of his, much older, had been run into, and was now being sued.  He had testified and as a result the criminals were after him. 

My writing partner called the Senior Lead Officer who came out and investigated. He even talked to the person who had been accused of the deliberate auto crash, their family, and there was no reason to think he was the member of a gang or after the man. He had, however, been seen in the park where the rich kid took morning walks. Reporting this in to the rich kid made no difference.

Weeks went by and then one day the rich kid showed up at the library. We all went over to talk to him, to figure out if he was OK by now, and to hear about his trip. But there was now something amiss with his eyes which appeared blank. He was clean yet there appeared to me to be a thin coat of grime on his skin.  And then I felt it and saw it. The skin crawled on my left forearm. This was the first and only time in my life that I experienced that.

Later I told another woman writer who used the library about this experience and she said, "He has ALWAYS given me that feeling."

We do not know this to be a fact, but we both wondered if he had been up to no good while he was gone.  Did he harm someone? Did he rape?  Did he assault?  Was it even possible he had murdered?  We were being fantastical in our thinking but the skin crawl says a lot - if not it all.

C 2023  Christine Trzyna


9/21/17

AM I BACK?

I've made myself no promises.  So I can't say that I'M BACK. 
I don't want to put any pressure on myself to produce content for this blog.
I'm back to being blasé about watching films.
I started reading e-books.  I like the time I save by finding out that I really don't want to read a particular book after all.  Notes and Reviews became a habit.


I know that I waste time by reading headlines, especially repetitive headlines. 
Especially headlines and stories that have no impact on my life at all.
So any headline and story I link to, must be part of a scrapbook.


I need to not scatter my time.


Lately my interests have turned back to music.
My personal music inventory is immense.
I've been ordering in and listening to jazz and singer-songwriter albums that I haven't ever heard by my favorite artists or that I haven't heard in a while.


I don't feel sentimental, at least not enough to only remember good things.
Is all history revisionist?
There's a good argument in favor of that idea.
But I think we owe it to ourselves, if no one else, to tell ourselves the truth about ourselves and the person we were in our past.
Can you conjure the person you were at 16?  21?  Last year?

12/15/13

THE LINGERING DEATH OF E-MAIL : SOAP BOX : CHRISTINE TRZYNA

THE LINGERING DEATH OF E-MAIL : SOAP BOX :  by CHRISTINE TRZYNA
 
 
As many of you already know, from the bad experience of it, Yahoo recently decided to "recycle" old e-mail addresses, those that no one had logged into in a year.  A year is really not a long time.  Now people are gaining access to other people's private information and communication.  IT IS A PRIVACY INVADING NIGHTMARE, one that is opening common ordinary people to identity theft and other embarrassments.  Yahoo may not be the only e-mail provider, as I hear now that Microsoft is doing the same thing, but I'm personally pissed off at Yahoo.

It's sometimes difficult not to believe that someone wants us all micro-chipped to prevent ID theft.  I got a call one morning a couple weeks ago from first one, then another, peach fuzz boy types, and they knew way too much about me.
 
I've been thinking about my whole e-mail experience and find that my enthusiasm for this form of communication, which I initially thought of as something closer to a telegram than a phone call, has waned considerably.

CLASS REQUIREMENT
 
My first e-mail experience was at college, where it became a requirement for a class to not only do all the reading and studying, taking quizzes and writing papers, but to also continue classroom discussion by e-mailing with the TA and classmates.  After trying to give some open, honest, and impactful feedback, I soon realized there wasn't much else to say or do.  Enough was enough.  (All professors do think their class is the only one you're taking!)

SAVING ON LONG DISTANCE PHONE BILLS

I used that e-mail account to be in touch with some friends who had become long distance to save on the phone bill (don't laugh! Few people had cell phones then.  Students who lived in the dorms were upset about there being only one phone jack in each room!)

One of my friends was into playing paint ball.  One day he sent me a message about a weekend paintball game that went something like "and I could have killed that guy."  The University server picked up the wording and sent a message about using their computers to send (or receive) threats that scared me enough that I called him long distance to warn him.  (Don't laugh even harder.)
 
Soon after that I opened a mainstream, non-university free e-mail account.  It would become one of many that I simply didn't use and walked away from rather than cancelling the account.  (I should have deleted all of them!)  I once even had EarthLink as a service - and their Internet dial up!

KEEPING A FRIENDSHIP GOING - OR NOT
 
As I neared graduation, with so very much work to do, finals, a thesis, and not knowing where the hell I was going to live in a few weeks, brewing rapidly, a friend who I'd been e-mailing back and forth taught me my first lesson about the nefarious use of e-mail. 

(And for this he is not forgiven.)

Nothing was more important to him at that point than the boycott he was declaring against a venue where he'd been holding free poetry classes over the whiff of cigarette smoke that had made it through the front doors.  When I look back on that now, I know this person had an anger disorder, and if it wasn't focused on one person, it would be focused on another. When I refused to join the boycott, our e-mailing ended along with our friendship.  But not until he, I heard, e-mailed his entire contact list of poets - hundreds - to say bad things about me. 

E-mail was being used to shame me? Shame on him!

Overall, I came to think that e-mail was a substandard way to keep a friendship going.  Text was too subject to misinterpretation.  But then, this was before the sometimes cute, sometimes irritating smiley and other emoticon faces. 

(OK, so now you are holding your belly and rolling on the floor.)

The first and best way to communicate with a person is in person where there is facial expression and the intonations of voice. Next comes the phone.  Letter writing - handwriting - is the next best.  You can diagnose the handwriting if you want to.  (Ah!  I see that the slant here has changed.  Her hand must be really tired and she's writing on the surface of a book at an angle!) Then typed letters or text oriented messages, like e-mail that are sight based only.

THE LEARNING CURVE CAN BE LIKE A ROLLERCOASTER

Forward a few years later - early 21st century - when I first began to blog.  A friend in a coffee house who was very into Social Networking and pretty much spending much of his day on his laptop doing just that suggested that I should experience the Yahoo Blogger.  I tried it under an assumed name and fake avatar and actually made a few "friendships," all that went Poof! as soon as Yahoo decided to discontinue that free product.   However, I enjoyed exercising my writing skills and learning to import pictures and videos. And what happened with that friend?  He managed to attract some very unsavory people into his life.  I used his laptop a few times to check e-mail and before you know it he was sending messages to my entire contact list, and with multiple accounts.  Clearly even though I logged in and out while he was in the men's room he was able to follow my keystrokes.  I started getting mail from the unsavory people he attracted.  I spent hours blocking this big mess.

AIN'T NOBODY'S BUSINESS BY MY OWN and THE MYTH OF THE PAPERLESS OFFICE

Next came the clever idea to save documents such as resumes, family pictures, research data, letters, edits, short stories, novel chapters, and other stuff that you would usually have saved in file boxes or cabinets on paper, things that require someone to actually break into your home to steal your property, on line, before the Internet in places like e-mail (or Photobucket, or some other product that has a "privacy settings.")  Things maybe you aren't ready to print out yet.  I bought into the myth of the paperless office.  I did this, and in multiple unrelated accounts.  My thinking was half correct and more cautious.   While my goal was preservation, such as if things were lost due to fire or flood or actual theft, there would be another place I could retrieve them.  In the end neither home or storage unit or Cloud is truly private and safe.

YOU NEVER KNOW SOMEONE UNTIL YOU GIVE THEM YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS

Next came using e-mail to give people you meet here, there, and around, who seem OK but you don't want them to know where you live or have your phone number - yet.  (Now people will say "Find me on Facebook!) 

In one case I took a local gardening class - a few sessions - and the teacher asked for contact information, she said to follow up on our gardening experiences.   Without my permission she gave my e-mail to someone at an agricultural program at a major university and soon after came one solicitation after another to be a slave laborer at a community garden.  More than one a week.  And an account that never had spam was subject to all the usual ROT of offers of penile implants, Viagra, Canadian Pharmacies, Diet Solutions,  Credit checks, Ponzi schemes, Job Offers, and Social Networking with Sluts, Local Sluts, Horny Sluts, and the one that really got me - Christian Sluts!  (Adriana, if you're reading this, you really belong in a jail cell.)

OK, this bothers me, a lot, because I have low tolerance for anything that comes close to porn.  I do not want my eyes to even accidentally subliminally view the Rot!
(And that means that I wish the lesbian porn site that attaches to this blog would cut the crap.)

In another case I attended, with an open mind but not conversion, a free class that was supposed to be about A Course In Miracles.  Turned out it was actually a psychic witch looking for clients.

Ditto. 

Never take a free class where you have to give your name, address, telephone number, or e-mail address as terms and conditions of "registration."  Time is money.
These people are putting together a mailing list and they will soon be sending you monthly, even weekly solicitations.  Do I have that much time to keep clicking and sending to Trash without reading.  No I don't ! 

A friend tells me that he never really knew what a great person his wife was until they needed to be divorced.

HACKERS ARE EVIL PEOPLE and THEY ARE NOT ALL FROM AFRICA

Recently an account I'd used for years with no spam at all was hacked.  I contacted someone who said they were a contracted to Yahoo, they got back to me, and said that they knew that this particular hacking event was one in which the goal was to read all my saved correspondence to put together a profile, invade my bank accounts, etc.  LUCKILY I NEVER DO ON-LINE BANKING or ANY FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS AT ALL ON LINE!  Yahoo said that the source of this was Africa and that the same people would then continue to "invade" my entire contact list and go from there.

Sadly, the old "Africa" excuse is just a teeny part of the problem.  Think I'm wrong?  Then attend a hacker convention in Vegas!

TOOLS ARE MEANT TO MAKE OUR TASKS EASIER, OUR LIVES SIMPLER
The U.S. post office is limping along with higher postage rates and less service.  Why? Because we started using e-mail instead of postage because we thought it would be cheaper.  BUT AT WHAT PRICE?  Meanwhile, for all your PSYCHOBABBLE LOVERS OUT THERE, there is a NEW DIAGNOSIS and NEW SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAMS!  Internet Addiction.  With it's sub categories such as SELFIE ADDICTION!  People who can't afford cell phones any more are going through withdrawal symptoms!

PS: Did I mention I'm pissed at Yahoo?
TO THE PERSON WHOSE PICTURE ON YAHOO HAS MY VERY WORDS FROM THIS GOOGLE BLOGGER RUNNING BELOW IT! 

I'm sorry for you, who ever you are, if you are looking for a job, a boyfriend, or whatever,  that YAHOO has you mixed up with me.  Yahoo, you are grabbing words that are on GOOGLE BLOGGER, and using them without my permission certainly.

C 2013 -2026 Christine Trzyna  All Rights Reserved including Internet and International Rights.



6/25/13

HAS THE PRIVACY INVASION SCANDAL MADE YOU PARANOID ABOUT BLOGGING?

HAS THE PRIVACY INVASION SCANDAL MADE YOU PARANOID ABOUT BLOGGING?

7/6/11

MURDOCK AND BROOKSIE HAVE GONE TOO FAR HACKING INTO PRIVATE VOICE MAIL ACCOUNTS : A BRITISH JOURNALISM SCANDLE : CHRISTINE TRZYNA OPINION

Scandal of the New Century ? YES! CERTAINLY! (If you haven't heard about this one yet, click on the title above to get to the Christian Science Monitor article, one of thousands of news reports about reporters !)

Do Reporters have the Right to Break a Story just because they can?

It seems that in an effort to have the news (and sell copy), there has been a severe and unforgiveable amount of privacy invasion. In this case someone who was found murdered, it is implied, may have just had a chance because, to cover their actions, journalists may have erased communications between the victim and those phoning her.

(( I think : As we know voice mail is time and date stamped. These attempts at communication are now tampered with. When, during the 6 months from missing to found dead, did these journalists pick up her voice mails and erase? Was she alive but her cell phone turned off? Had she been using it?))

THE ACTIONS OF THE JOURNALISTS, THIS EDITOR, THIS PUBLICATION and ITS OWNER are challenging existing notions and laws about privacy for the vast majority of us who are not celebrities, but in this case, even if this mudered one were a celebrity, it would still be unforgiveable: this is not the same as reporting a "baby bump" when your informant is a sales clerk on Rodeo who waits on the rich and famous.

TO THE POINT : There is need for a new and clear understanding of JOURNALISTIC BOUNDARIES these days and that means REVIEWING THE JOB DESCRIPTIONS.

Journalists should never misrepresent themselves or their intent in writing an article and SHOULD NOT BE, for instance, SNEAKS, LIARS, or LAW BREAKERS in order to get a story!

Sometimes it seems that, in search of a story and accuracy, Investigative Journalists (which includes gossip columnists) seem to be doing the job of Police Investigators, Private Eyes, Spys. The competition to get the story first is fierce, but journalists should be judged too on their professionalism and that means holding to standards! Do you have informants who remain unnamed? Of course!

INTERFERING in the work of Police Investigators, Private Eyes, and Spys, of law enforcement and the criminal justice system however, is WAY TOO FAR OVER BOUNDARIES.

I do hold the editor more responsible than those working under her. I hold editors responsible for their decision to hand out assignments and to choose to print articles as they were written and to challenge reporters to greatness.

C 2011 Christine Trzyna All Rights Reserved including Internation and Internet Rights